Home

Fellowship Alumni Platform
COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE (Cop)

Home
  • Home
  • About
    • About-Us
    • User Guides
  • Cohorts
    • Cohort -1
    • Cohort -2
    • Cohort -3
    • Cohort -4
    • Cohort -5
    • Supervisory Team
  • Thematic Areas
  • Browse
    • Rosters of Fellows
    • Fellows Projects
    • Discussion Posts
    • Shared Files
    • Blog Posts
  • Events
    • Fellows Calander
    • ECA Calander
  • Resources
    • ECA Knowledge Hub
    • Institutional Repository
    • ASKIA Search Engine
    • Lib Guides
    • African Knowledge Management Hub (AKMH)
    • UN AKMH/Covid-19 Hub
    • UNECA Data Portal
  • Gallery

Skip to content
  • Recent
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
fchigaruundefined

CHIGARU Farai, Malawi, SRO-WA

@fchigaru
Cohorts-5
About
Posts
6
Topics
2
Groups
1
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Transport Digitalization
    fchigaruundefined fchigaru

    Well...while the intentions are there - with existing hard infrastructure - the biggest obstacles are the soft infrastructure, the institutions. Institutions are non-permitting when it comes to innovations to improve effectiveness and efficiency. Theoretically, we can discuss on their inability to reward innovators (in the form of patents etc)- while in addition in reality, gate-keeping is one of the obstacles of innovation. For example, individuals who own transport facilities (trucks etc) would be against the idea of adopting rail transportation to protect their purses.

    Secondly, the sunk-cost fallacy of the individuals deter them from accepting innovative initiatives. The mentality of being comfortable with what they have learnt over time and the fear of being a novice in new initiatives deters individuals to push for the latter.


  • China to drop all import taxes for 53 African Countries. Is Africa ready?
    fchigaruundefined fchigaru

    There is a lot of talk on how (possibly) Africa could benefit from the reduced (or eliminated) tariffs on African Imports.

    However, do you think Africa is ready to benefit from this? and to what extent? Considering quality requirements conditions.

    Is this another missed opportunity or an information shock that could induce structural transformation( labour shifting from low value-added to higher value added sectors)?


  • Time to be Bold
    fchigaruundefined fchigaru

    I would suggest that digitization and automation would play a vital role in this - this would surely enhance efficiency. Of-course while that is so, it would also derail on harnessing the demographic dividend due to jobs that would be deemed redundant (laid off) due to automation. At the end of the day, it is an issue of cost-benefit assessments, on what we are willing to let go to achieve the set goals.


  • What is the fiscal, policy, and legal willingness of African countries in investing in climate adaptation?
    fchigaruundefined fchigaru
    1. Is there anyone who has worked in climate change related areas or has done/is doing climate change related research? Would be great to leverage on each others experience!

    2. On another note, what are the sentiments of the governments (in your countries)when it comes to investing in climate change adaptation strategies - given the share of Africa's contribution to climate change?


  • AfDB wants to tax the African diaspora: a good idea or not?
    fchigaruundefined fchigaru

    BANENGAI KOYAMA Torcia Chanelle,Central African Republic,MFGD Would you clarify on the taxes that these governments are imposing on diaspora contributions? I see it difficult given the capacity of tax administration systems in African countries. See my thinking below:

    I agree with you on the significant roles of remittances - but due to the informality of the channels that the diaspora use in remitting funds to left-behind households, i believe it would be difficult for governments to succeed at this. In addition, i believe the more they attempt to tax these formal channels, the more the informal channels will present themselves - which would lead to reduced formal tracking of remittances by government albeit people still increasing the volumes. At the macro-level, this problem in the external sector will present spill-over problems to the real, financial, and public sectors. In Malawi for example, this presents data accuracy issues by central banks (research loses validation), presents an informal black market for forex (people create forex markets on social media), and limits forex availability (forex does not go through banks) (this ofcourse will have many other consequences for import dependent countries).


  • Vulnerability to climate change
    fchigaruundefined fchigaru

    I agree with your observation and everyone else's. While we focus on the macro level analyses, my input would be to suggest at also looking at the micro level analyses - to improve mitigation. By doing this, this shoulders the problem of corruption in Africa- where regardless of climate finance that could be made available, the vulnerable rarely benefit from this (ofcourse while bearing the burden of debt repayment arising from climate finance). In my research, i focus on the micro-level, local factors - factors within the reach of the person living under $1.90 a day- that could mitigate the impact of climate shocks toward household level welfare. for example, interested in looking at how incidence and intensity of social networks (relationships within a community) in a rural economy would cushion the impacts of climate shocks on Migration (whether Migration is or is not a problem, is a different issue, for now :) )

  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Recent
  • Groups