Demographic Dynamics for Development

As Malawi votes AGAIN tomorrow since multi-democracy in 1994 - it still remains one of the poorest countries in Africa. This is albeit absence of any conflict. The common trend always appears for electives to focus on being re-elected in the next elections, whose motive could bring short term gains that often trade-off with longer term sustainable benefits. One could argue that, uncertainty of re-election of elected presidents is what causes mis-prioritization of development efforts, poor governance, and corruption.

Indeed democracy has its benefits, but does it outweigh its costs for African countries? - specifically asking..."what could have happened if there was no democracy, and presidents were secure about their presidency"?

If yes, then how do we mitigate poor governance that comes from insecurity of re-election?

BANENGAI KOYAMA Torcia Chanelle,Central African Republic,MFGD Taxing the diaspora risks alienating a community that already contributes significantly through remittances. Instead of a mandatory tax, why not design innovative diaspora bonds or investment vehicles that allow participation while ensuring transparency and trust?

Yes, Africa can gain a demographic dividend from its youthful population by strategically investing in key areas such as education and skills development to ensure quality training, improving healthcare access for a healthier workforce, creating job opportunities in sectors like technology and agriculture, supporting entrepreneurship through resources and finance, and enhancing infrastructure for better connectivity. These investments are crucial for leveraging the potential of the youth to drive sustainable economic growth.